Macroporous chitosan/alginate hydrogels crosslinked with genipin accumulate and retain glioblastoma cancer cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Grade IV multiforme glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive cancer that remains incurable due to the GBM cells invading and proliferating in the surrounding healthy tissues, even after tumor resection. A new therapeutic paradigm to treat GBM is to attract and accumulate GBM cells in a macroporous hydrogel inserted in the surgical cavity after tumor resection, followed by a targeted high dose of radiotherapy. This work presents a molding-based method to prepare macroporous hydrogels composed of sodium alginate and chitosan, homogeneously mixed in solution using sodium bicarbonate, and subsequently crosslinked with genipin and calcium chloride. The gels display a blue color, the result of chitosan crosslinking with genipin, fully interconnected pores with an average diameter of 180 μm (and tunable over a wide range), with a compression modulus of 10 kPa, close to the value of brain tissues. The gels are stable in cell culture media and keep their integrity after radiation doses comparable to current GBM treatment levels. Finally, F98 GBM cells accumulate relatively homogeneously and are retained within the gels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".