MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

1314 Immunostimulatory nanofilaments turn cancer cells into neoantigen agnostic cancer vaccines

2024· article· en· W4404064430 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kevin Neil, Samuel Génier, J Douchin, Elisa Jardot, Sébastien Rodrigue, E. Boucher Lauren, Jean‐François Millau

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancerComputational biologyCancer cellComputer scienceCancer researchBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Checkpoint immunotherapy revolutionized cancer treatment by potentiating antitumor immune responses. However, checkpoint inhibitor treatments fail in most patients, which is attributable in part to the lack of pre-existing antitumor immune cells. To circumvent this problem, personalized cancer vaccines have been used to mount immune responses against selected tumor antigens. This approach provided compelling efficacy data in the clinic, but also delays treatments and suffers from a high cost of production. Leveraging tumors as a direct source of neoantigens by turning cancer cells into immunogenic targets constitutes an attractive off-the-shelf alternative to overcome these limitations. <h3>Methods</h3> Using synthetic biology, we developed a new immunotherapy based on nanofilaments that bind to cancer cells and makes them more immunogenic. This approach leverages a bacteriophage engineered to display multiple therapeutic proteins simultaneously. The nanofilament candidate TAT003 combines PD-L1 blockade, interleukin-2 receptor stimulation, and a TLR9 agonistic activities. The biological activities of TAT003 were evaluated by ELISA and cellular assays. The therapeutic activity of TAT003 was then measured in syngeneic mouse models upon intratumoral administration in injected and non-injected lesions. Immune profiling of tumors was performed by flow cytometry. Cytokine paneling following TAT003 stimulation was also done <i>ex vivo</i> on micro-dissected tumor tissues on chip. <h3>Results</h3> TAT003 displayed biologically active anti-PD-L1 and IL-2 simultaneously (figure 1A-C). Upon intratumoral injection, TAT003 induced a potent antitumor response in several syngeneic cancer models, both locally and systemically (figure 1D). Injection of TAT003 in a tumor locally resulted in a strong infiltration and activation of myeloid cells (figure 1E), while it led to an increase in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in non-injected lesions, as well as, an increase in the frequency of circulating tumor-cell specific CD8<sup>+</sup> T-cells (figure 1F,G). TAT003 modulated the tumor micro-environment, inducing changes in the secretion of chemokines and cytokines from tumor associated immune cells, with some subsets being consistently induced or repressed across different tumor types (figure 1H). <h3>Conclusions</h3> TAT003, a nanofilament combining an anti-PD-L1, IL-2, and a TLR9 agonist promotes tumor clearance by (1) sparking intense infiltration and activation of myeloid cells in injected lesions, and (2) potentiating the activity of tumor cell specific CD8+ T cells through PD-L1/PD1 blockade and IL-2 stimulation. These compounding immune responses suggest TAT003-activated myeloid cells capture tumor neoantigens and help ignite a neoantigen specific T-cell immune response further potentiated by TAT003. Taken together, multimodal nanofilaments are a promising modality that stimulates antitumor immunity in novel ways. <h3>Acknowledgements</h3> The authors thank Prof. Jamie Scott, Dr. Gerald Baptiste, Dr. Howard Kaufman and Dr. Stéphane Champiat for their thoughtful advices. We are grateful to Émilie St-Pierre for her contributions to initial experiments that lead to the work presented in this article. Our collaborations with Eve technologies, the Plateforme d’histologie de l’Université de Sherbrooke, and the Plateforme de purification de protéine de l’Université de Sherbrooke are much appreciated; they have been instrumental to this work. We are especially grateful to Genome Québec, the Ministère de l’Économie et de l’Innovation du Québec and our private investors for funding the research reported here. <h3>Ethics Approval</h3> All mouse-related protocols were strictly evaluated to avoid animal suffering by the Université de Sherbrooke Animal Care Committee. The recommendations respect the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207