MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404065481 · doi:10.1088/2631-8695/ad8f17

Cepstrum-driven modulated empirical wavelet transform and its application in bearing fault diagnosis

2024· article· en· W4404065481 on OpenAlexaff
Peng Wang, Zhenming Chen, Shaohua Lu, Bing Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Research Express · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsMD Precision (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCepstrumFault (geology)Bearing (navigation)Wavelet transformComputer scienceWaveletSpeech recognitionPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceGeologySeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Empirical wavelet transform (EWT) has a complete theoretical support and can adaptively separate modes with different characteristics from the frequency domain. Signal decomposition and mode extraction based on the empirical wavelet transform can obtain more accurate components. This paper proposes a modulated empirical wavelet transform driven by cepstrum under the basic framework of traditional EWT method. The most innovative point of this paper is to use the characteristics of cepstrum to update the waveform of trend spectrum and realize the function of separating different modes. The filtering process constructs filter banks covering the entire frequency band based on scaling functions and empirical wavelets. In order to enhance the fault characteristics from the filtering components, the amplitude of its spectrum was modulated based on the Fourier transform characteristics. Finally, the effectiveness of the algorithm is verified by using simulation signals and experimental signals provided by Case Western Reserve University.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering Research ExpressSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207