Stratégies d’intégration et de support en santé mentale des immigrants francophones au Canada anglais
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore les stratégies d’intégration au système de santé telles que proposées par des personnes immigrantes francophones au sein de communautés francophones en situation minoritaire au Canada (CFSM). Une recherche qualitative par entrevues semi-dirigées a été menée dans trois villes canadiennes auprès de soixante personnes adultes immigrantes ou réfugiées. Centrées sur les représentations des personnes immigrantes quant aux services de soutien en santé mentale, diverses stratégies ont été dégagées. La préparation prémigratoire et le regroupement des informations sous un guichet unique semblent contribuer à une intégration réussie. L’appui des organismes communautaires et des autorités religieuses est bénéfique pour le soutien informationnel et socioémotionnel des nouveaux arrivants, ayant des retombées positives sur leur bienêtre et leur capacité de s’intégrer à leur nouveau milieu de vie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".