MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404067774 · doi:10.7202/1114157ar

Creating a Culture of Active Offer in Both Official Languages: A Case Study of a Dialogue

2024· article· en· W4404067774 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Éric Forgues, Christine C. Paulin

Bibliographic record

VenueMinorités linguistiques et société · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinguisticsComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To establish a culture of active service provision (AO) in both official languages, Horizon Health Network in New Brunswick conducted dialogue sessions involving over 3,400 employees. These discussions enabled participants to express their opinions on AO, the challenges encountered, and potential solutions. Our project aimed to gain a better understanding of the impact of dialogue activities on the development of an AO culture within the Horizon Health Network. Analysis of the evaluations conducted after each session, internal documentation, and interviews with eight organizers and facilitators of these dialogues, indicate that this type of exercise has the potential to establish an AO culture while also providing insights into certain obstacles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.944

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMinorités linguistiques et sociétéSame topicLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesFrench-language works237,207