Recenser les promesses pédagogiques de la philosophie pour enfants au Québec : un demi-siècle d’histoire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce travail présente une revue de littérature systématique des travaux universitaires de maîtrise et de doctorat réalisés au Québec, entre 1986 et 2022, au sujet des pratiques de la philosophie pour enfants. Nous cherchons à rendre compte des promesses pédagogiques, c’est-à-dire des effets postulés découlant d’une pratique du dialogue philosophique, formulées par ces jeunes chercheurs et chercheuses. Étudier ces promesses permet de repérer de nombreux éléments intéressants de ce champ de recherche, car ce dernier semble s’être construit dans une relation étroite avec le domaine de la pratique pédagogique elle-même. Notre analyse sera prolongée par une discussion sur les relations qui se dessinent entre cette pratique pédagogique spécifique, l’évolution historique des attentes du monde de l’éducation (sur presque quatre décennies), et l’évolution des effets postulés faites par la recherche sur cette pratique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".