L’organisation communautaire au sein du service public québécois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur l’émergence, la structuration et les pratiques d’un groupe professionnel, celui des organisateur·rices communautaires (OC) au sein du réseau public de la santé et des services sociaux au Québec. S’appuyant sur des pratiques issues des mouvements sociaux, le segment étatisé de ce groupe professionnel s’est adapté tout en participant aux évolutions de l’action publique pour définir sa position et maintenir le sens de son travail au service des habitant·es des quartiers populaires et de la lutte contre les inégalités sociales. À partir du cas d’un OC ayant exercé dans un quartier populaire de Montréal de 1976 à 2012, nous revenons sur les incertitudes et les ambivalences qui ont accompagné la professionnalisation du groupe des OC au sein du service public, entre approche contestataire et approche pragmatique de l’action publique. L’étude de cette trajectoire singulière insérée dans la trajectoire collective du groupe professionnel éclaire les transformations de l’État social pour montrer comment les tensions constitutives du métier et les pratiques professionnelles entre action collective et action publique se reconfigurent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".