MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Incidence of canine chronic kidney disease and its associated risk factors in and around Bhubaneswar, Odisha

2024· article· en· W4404073499 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ritu Gupta, Geeta Rani Jena, Dhirendra Kumar, Deepak Kumar Chaurasia, Santosh Kumar Panda

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)Kidney diseaseMedicineDiseaseEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a highly prevalent renal disease of geriatric dogs leading to decreased survivability that is manageable with renoprotective therapy. The objective of this research work is to study prospective incidence of canine chronic kidney disease based on different parameters such as breed, age, and change in lifestyle of pet dogs. The incidence was recorded highest in German shepherd followed by Labrador retriever among different breeds of dogs. Prevalence was observed more in dogs over 7 years and male dogs were found more affected as compare to female dogs. Risk factors associated with dogs are maintenance with lifetime high protein pet food and presence of concurrent disease that depicts positive correlation with incidence of CKD in dogs. Studies in Teaching Veterinary Clinical Complex, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, OUAT, Bhubaneswar and different hospitals of Bhubaneswar suggested increased incidence of canine chronic kidney disease in German shepherd dogs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Advanced Biochemistry ResearchSame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207