Identification of Y-chromosome turnover in newts fails to support a sex chromosome origin for the <i>Triturus</i> balanced lethal system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Non-recombining regions of the genome often have profound effects on evolution, resulting in phenomena such as sex chromosomes and supergenes. Amongst the strangest examples are balanced lethal systems, such as that found in newts of the genus Triturus . These systems halve reproductive output, and the evolution of such a deleterious trait is difficult to explain. For Triturus an intriguing model proposes that the balanced lethal system evolved from an ancestral Y-chromosome. To test this hypothesis, we identify the Y-chromosome of Triturus and verify whether it, or the balanced lethal system, is homologous to the Y-chromosome of its sister genus Lissotriton , which does not possess the balanced lethal system. We identify a set of candidate Y-linked markers in T. ivanbureschi and place them on a high-density linkage map that we construct with 7,233 RADseq markers. We validate male specificity of the markers across the genus, and then place both the Triturus and Lissotriton Y-linked regions within previously constructed target capture linkage maps that include genes linked to the balanced lethal system. We observe that neither the Triturus balanced lethal system, nor the Triturus Y-chromosome are homologous to the Lissotriton Y-chromosome. This is the first molecular evidence of a transition between Y-chromosome systems within salamanders. However, unless additional sex chromosome turnover events are involved, our data does not support a sex chromosome origin of the balanced lethal system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".