Improved Polar Current Shell Algorithm for Ocean Current Retrieval from X-Band Radar Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an improved algorithm for retrieving ocean surface currents from X-band marine radar images. The original polar current shell (PCS) method begins with a 3D fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the radar image sequence, followed by the extraction of the dispersion shell from the 3D image spectrum, which is then transformed into a PCS using polar coordinates. Building on this foundation, the improved approach is to analyze all data points corresponding to different wavenumber magnitudes in the PCS domain rather than analyzing each specific wavenumber magnitude separately. In addition, kernel density estimation (KDE) to identify high-density directions, interquartile range filtering to remove outliers, and symmetry-based filtering to further reduce noise by comparing data from opposite directions are also utilized for further improvement. Finally, a single curve fitting is applied to the filtered data rather than conducting multiple curve fittings as in the original method. The algorithm is validated using simulated data and real radar data from both the Decca radar, established in 2008, and the Koden radar, established in 2017. For the 2008 Decca radar data, the improved PCS method reduced the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) for speed estimation by 0.06 m/s and for direction estimation by 3.8° while improving the correlation coefficients (CCs) for current speed by 0.06 and direction by 0.07 compared to the original PCS method. For the 2017 Koden radar data, the improved PCS method reduced the RMSD for speed by 0.02 m/s and for direction by 4.6°, with CCs being improved for current speed by 0.03 and direction by 0.05 compared to the original PCS method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".