MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404090108 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.094503

Improved analysis of strong-interaction-stable doubly bottom tetraquarks on the lattice

2024· article· en· W4404090108 on OpenAlexafffund
Brian Colquhoun, Anthony Francis, Renwick J. Hudspith, Randy Lewis, Kim Maltman, W. G. Parrott

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science and Technology Council
KeywordsLattice (music)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We update earlier lattice results for the binding energies of the flavor antitriplet of strong-interaction-stable doubly bottom, <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msup> <a:mi>J</a:mi> <a:mi>P</a:mi> </a:msup> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:msup> <a:mn>1</a:mn> <a:mo>+</a:mo> </a:msup> </a:math> tetraquarks, employing an extended sink construction which produces significantly improved ground-state effective-mass plateaus, as well as new, larger-volume ensembles which reduce possible finite-volume effects at lighter pion masses. The updated bindings are 115(17) MeV for the <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:mi>I</c:mi> <c:mo>=</c:mo> <c:mn>0</c:mn> </c:math> member of the antitriplet and 47(8) MeV for its <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:mi>I</e:mi> <e:mo>=</e:mo> <e:mn>1</e:mn> <e:mo>/</e:mo> <e:mn>2</e:mn> </e:math> partner. We also provide an update of our earlier study of the variable heavy mass dependence of binding in the <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:msup> <g:mn>1</g:mn> <g:mo>+</g:mo> </g:msup> </g:math> channel and new results on this dependence for binding in the <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:msup> <i:mn>0</i:mn> <i:mo>+</i:mo> </i:msup> </i:math> channel, accessible when the two heavy quarks have unequal masses. Implications of these results of potential relevance to experimental searches for signals of the production of doubly bottom tetraquarks and/or a possible bottom-charm partner of the <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:msub> <k:mi>T</k:mi> <k:mrow> <k:mi>c</k:mi> <k:mi>c</k:mi> </k:mrow> </k:msub> </k:math> are also discussed. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.403 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207