MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ADTGP: correcting single-cell antibody sequencing data using Gaussian process regression

2024· article· en· W4404091271 on OpenAlexaff
Alex C.H. Liu, Steven M. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretabilityComputer scienceR packageIsotypeRaw dataRegressionProcess (computing)Count dataData miningAlgorithmComputational biologyStatisticsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceAntibodyBiologyImmunologyComputational science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY: We present ADTGP, an R package that uses Gaussian process regression to correct droplet-specific technical noise in single-cell protein sequencing data. ADTGP improves the interpretability of the data by modeling the distribution of protein expression, conditioned on equal isotype control counts across cells. ADTGP is written in R and needs only the protein raw counts, isotype control raw counts, and a design matrix to run. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ADTGP can be installed from https://github.com/northNomad/ADTGP. It depends on Stan and the R package 'cmdstanr'.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioinformaticsSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207