MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404092794 · doi:10.7759/cureus.73171

Oral Metronomic Therapy: An Effective Palliative Treatment Option for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

2024· article· en· W4404092794 on OpenAlexaff
Nandini Devi R, Abhilash Menon, Praveen Kumar Shenoy, Manuprasad Avaronnan, Allwin George

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsASTER
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOvarian cancerInternal medicineOncologyEpithelial ovarian cancerCancerChemotherapySerous fluidSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The majority of the patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer relapse within three years of standard first-line treatment. Access to novel therapies like poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents is limited in low- and middle-income countries. Oral metronomic therapy (OMT) may be an effective alternative treatment option in resource-limited settings. Materials and methods A retrospective study was conducted among patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who received OMT. OMT consisted of cyclophosphamide 50mg per day and tamoxifen 40mg per day which was administered continuously until unacceptable toxicity or progression was reached. OMT was given to patients with relapsed ovarian cancer and to those newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients who were unfit for cytoreductive surgery and/or standard first-line intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy. All patients who received OMT at our center between 01-01-2017 and 31-12-2021 were included for analysis. Relevant details, as needed for the study, were collected from medical records. SPSS version 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 61 patients received OMT during the study period. The median age at diagnosis of ovarian cancer was 59 years. The median age at the start of OMT was 61 years. The majority (n= 37, 60.7%) had high-grade serous carcinoma subtype. A total of 52 patients received OMT in the relapse setting while nine received it in the first-line setting. Among relapsed ovarian cancer patients, 13 patients (21.3%) experienced platinum-sensitive relapse, 16 patients (26.2%) experienced partial platinum-sensitive relapse, and 23 patients (37.7%) experienced platinum-resistant disease. The mean duration of treatment with OMT was 7.8 months. The clinical benefit rate was 59% and the overall response rate was 22.9%. Ca-125 response was seen in 40.4% of patients. The median PFS for the overall group was 6.7 months. Median PFS was longer in patients with Ca-125 response and platinum-sensitive relapse. Only five patients (8.1%) had significant toxicity. Conclusion OMT is a safe and effective palliative treatment option for epithelial ovarian cancer, worth consideration in low- and middle-income countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207