Optimizing task assignment and routing operations with a heterogeneous fleet of unmanned aerial vehicles for emergency healthcare services
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the optimization of task assignment and pickup and delivery operations using a heterogeneous fleet of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). We specifically address the distribution of emergency medical supplies, including medications, vaccines, and essential medical aid, as well as the collection of biological blood samples for testing and analysis. Unique challenges, such as supply shortages, time windows, and geographical considerations, are explicitly taken into account. The problem is first formulated as a mixed-integer linear programming model aimed at maximizing the total profit derived from the execution of a set of emergency healthcare pickup and delivery tasks. An enhanced Q-learning-based adaptive large neighborhood search (QALNS) is proposed for large-scale benchmark instances. QALNS exhibits a superior performance on benchmark instances. It also improves the quality of the solutions on average by 5.49% and 6.86% compared to the Gurobi solver and a state-of-the-art adaptive large neighborhood search algorithm, respectively. Sensitivity analyses are performed on critical factors contributing to the performance of the QALNS algorithm, such as the learning rate and the discount indicator. Finally, we provide managerial insights on the use of the fleet of UAVs and the design of the network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".