Optimizing task assignment and routing operations with a heterogeneous fleet of unmanned aerial vehicles for emergency healthcare services
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the optimization of task assignment and pickup and delivery operations using a heterogeneous fleet of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). We specifically address the distribution of emergency medical supplies, including medications, vaccines, and essential medical aid, as well as the collection of biological blood samples for testing and analysis. Unique challenges, such as supply shortages, time windows, and geographical considerations, are explicitly taken into account. The problem is first formulated as a mixed-integer linear programming model aimed at maximizing the total profit derived from the execution of a set of emergency healthcare pickup and delivery tasks. An enhanced Q-learning-based adaptive large neighborhood search (QALNS) is proposed for large-scale benchmark instances. QALNS exhibits a superior performance on benchmark instances. It also improves the quality of the solutions on average by 5.49% and 6.86% compared to the Gurobi solver and a state-of-the-art adaptive large neighborhood search algorithm, respectively. Sensitivity analyses are performed on critical factors contributing to the performance of the QALNS algorithm, such as the learning rate and the discount indicator. Finally, we provide managerial insights on the use of the fleet of UAVs and the design of the network. • We study a model for emergency healthcare logistics with heterogeneous UAVs. • We design a novel metaheuristic QALNS, incorporating Q-learning into parts of ALNS. • QALNS outperforms and provides superior results compared to the standard ALNS. • Managerial insights are provided on UAV usability in emergency healthcare logistics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it