MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404097419 · doi:10.1007/s43037-024-00394-2

Correction to: On the numerical ranges of matrices in max algebra

2024· article· en· W4404097419 on OpenAlexafffund
Davod Thaghizadeh, Mohsen Zahraei, Narges Haj Aboutalebi, Aljoša Peperko, Shaun Fallat

Bibliographic record

VenueBanach Journal of Mathematical Analysis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPolynomial and algebraic computation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsAlgebra over a fieldMatrix algebraPure mathematicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We correct some unfortunate mistakes that appeared in the article D. Thaghizadeh, M. Zahraei, A. Peperko, and N. H. Aboutalebi, On the numerical ranges of matrices in max algebra, Banach J. Math. Anal., 14 (2020), 1773–1792, concerning certain notions of the numerical range in the max algebra setting. Along the way we also include a study of the characteristic max polynomial and correspondingly the max k-spectrum and the k-tropical spectrum. We also pose a related and intriguing open question.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.087
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.087
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0050.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBanach Journal of Mathematical AnalysisSame topicPolynomial and algebraic computationFrench-language works237,207