MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CANADA’S MIGRATION POLICY: PRIORITIES FOR TRANSFORMATIONAL CHANGE

2024· article· en· W4404098408 on OpenAlex
V.V. Voskoboinyk

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVìsnik Marìupolʹsʹkogo deržavnogo unìversitetu Serìâ Ekonomìka · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformational leadershipPolitical scienceGeographyEconomic geographyPublic relations

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to the identification of transformational changes in Canada’s migration policy in the current geopolitical and socio-economic conditions. The origins of the formation of the state migration policy of Canada were identified, and statistical indicators on the number of immigrants in Canada in 2000-2020 were analyzed. It is established that in 2023, the vast majority (97.6 %) of Canada’s population growth came from international migration (both permanent and temporary immigration) and the remaining portion (2.4 %) came from natural increase. The structure of the plans for immigration levels in Canada for 2023-2026 is studied. Overall, the Immigration Levels Plan 2024–2026 has permanent resident admissions targets of 485,000 in 2024 and 500,000 in 2025. For 2026, the plan is to stabilize at the 500,000 level. The components of the strategic approach to immigration regulation are summarized; the categories of immigrant admission in Canada, as well as the main state immigration programs are characterized. It is concluded that Canada’s current migration policy is focused mainly on business migration. The author identifies the comprehensive tools for regulating immigration that have been operating in Canada for many years. The author highlights the current trends in the regulation of state migration flows that have emerged over the past few years (active promotion of digital transformation, increased competition for talent, revision of immigration goals in the context of determining certain restrictions). The article contains a proposed list of the main components of Canada’s modern migration policy (focus on long-term economic growth; support for humanitarian traditions; support for Francophone immigration; continued implementation of new digital systems in the field of migration regulation). Conclusions are drawn that it is expedient to further study the current transformational changes in Canada’s migration policy in the context of finding effective measures and instruments for regulating migration flows on the principles of long-term and complexity. Keywords: Canada, immigrants, international migrants, labor market, migration, migration policy, transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it