MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404101453 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2024.3492809

Optimal Requirements of Spare Transformers and Mobile Units for Distribution Substations via Genetic Algorithm and Monte Carlo Techniques

2024· article· en· W4404101453 on OpenAlexaff
Armando M. Leite da Silva, JoãoGuilherme C. Costa, G. Hamoud

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsHydro One (Canada)
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsSpare partMonte Carlo methodGenetic algorithmComputer scienceTransformerReliability engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringMathematicsVoltageMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a new optimization method based on enhanced genetic algorithm (GA) and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) techniques, which are simultaneously applied to size regular spare transformer (RST) and mobile unit substations (MUS) stocks for distribution substations. The aim is to serve a group of electrical energy distribution substations to mitigate possible losses caused by load curtailments due to major failures that affect the substation transformers. The proposed method includes the use of resources such as MUS and load transfer, in addition to representing the expansion of the transformers group in operation and the increase in power demand, over a specified planning horizon, considering all waiting times inherent to system actions, e.g.,: RST installation, MUS connection, stock replenishment, etc. Two real systems with different characteristics are used to illustrate the proposed method, allowing the analysis of results obtained from different scenarios and parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207