MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404105559 · doi:10.1159/000541384

The Effectiveness of Regionalization of Perinatal Care and Specific Facility-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review

2024· review· en· W4404105559 on OpenAlexaff
Ayesha Arshad Ali, Hamna Amir Naseem, Zoha Allahuddin, Rahima Yasin, Maha Azhar, Sawera Hanif, Jai K Das, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Bibliographic record

VenueNeonatology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionMedicineSystematic reviewMEDLINEEnvironmental healthPediatricsNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Appropriate perinatal care provision and utilization is crucial to improve maternal and newborn survival and potentially meet Sustainable Development Goal 3. Ensuring availability of healthcare infrastructure as well as skilled personnel can potentially help improve maternal and neonatal outcomes globally as well as in resource-limited settings. METHODS: A systematic review on effectiveness of perinatal care regionalization was updated, and a new review on facility-based interventions to improve postnatal care coverage and outcomes was conducted. The interventions were identified through literature reviews and included transport, mHealth, telemedicine, maternal education, capacity building, and incentive packages. Search was conducted in relevant databases and meta-analysis conducted on Review Manager 5.4. We conducted subgroup analysis for evidence from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). RESULTS: Implementation of regionalization programs significantly decreased maternal mortality in LMICs (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.34-0.55, 2 studies), stillbirth overall (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54-0.89, 5 studies), perinatal mortality overall (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.5-0.58, 2 studies), and LMICs (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.50-0.58, 1 study). Transport-related interventions significantly decreased maternal mortality overall (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.40-0.74, 1 study), neonatal mortality (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.66-0.88, 1 study), perinatal mortality (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.95, 1 study), and improved postnatal care coverage (OR: 6.89; 95% CI: 5.15-9.21, 1 study) in LMICs. Adding maternity homes/units significantly decreased stillbirth (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.61-0.93, 1 study) in LMICs. Incentives for postnatal care significantly improved infant mortality (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.65-0.96, 1 study), stillbirth (OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.44-0.83, 1 study), and postnatal care coverage (RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.03-1.25, 1 study) in LMICs. Telemedicine improved postnatal care coverage significantly in LMICs (RR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.22-5.28, 3 studies) and decreased maternal mortality (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.21-0.98, 1 study) and infant mortality (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.45-0.95) in LMICs. Maternal education significantly decreased neonatal mortality (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66-0.84, 2 studies), perinatal mortality (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.95, 1 study), infant mortality (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.65-0.96, 1 study), and stillbirth (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.45-0.82, 1 study). Capacity-building interventions significantly decreased maternal mortality in LMICs (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.29-0.46, 5 studies), neonatal mortality overall (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.53-0.98, 4 studies) and in LMICs (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.54-0.74, 3 studies, and RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.48-0.79, 3 studies), perinatal mortality (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.45-0.62, 2 studies, and RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.95, 1 study), infant mortality (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.43-0.59, 1 study, and RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.65-0.96, 1 study), under-5 mortality (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.94, 1 study), and stillbirth in LMICs (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.62-0.82, 4 studies), and preterm birth overall (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.19-0.81, 1 study). CONCLUSION: Perinatal regionalization and facility-based interventions have a positive impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes and calls for implementation in high burden settings but a better understanding of optimal interventions is needed through comprehensive trials in diverse settings. INTRODUCTION: Appropriate perinatal care provision and utilization is crucial to improve maternal and newborn survival and potentially meet Sustainable Development Goal 3. Ensuring availability of healthcare infrastructure as well as skilled personnel can potentially help improve maternal and neonatal outcomes globally as well as in resource-limited settings. METHODS: A systematic review on effectiveness of perinatal care regionalization was updated, and a new review on facility-based interventions to improve postnatal care coverage and outcomes was conducted. The interventions were identified through literature reviews and included transport, mHealth, telemedicine, maternal education, capacity building, and incentive packages. Search was conducted in relevant databases and meta-analysis conducted on Review Manager 5.4. We conducted subgroup analysis for evidence from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). RESULTS: Implementation of regionalization programs significantly decreased maternal mortality in LMICs (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.34-0.55, 2 studies), stillbirth overall (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54-0.89, 5 studies), perinatal mortality overall (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.5-0.58, 2 studies), and LMICs (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.50-0.58, 1 study). Transport-related interventions significantly decreased maternal mortality overall (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.40-0.74, 1 study), neonatal mortality (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.66-0.88, 1 study), perinatal mortality (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.95, 1 study), and improved postnatal care coverage (OR: 6.89; 95% CI: 5.15-9.21, 1 study) in LMICs. Adding maternity homes/units significantly decreased stillbirth (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.61-0.93, 1 study) in LMICs. Incentives for postnatal care significantly improved infant mortality (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.65-0.96, 1 study), stillbirth (OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.44-0.83, 1 study), and postnatal care coverage (RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.03-1.25, 1 study) in LMICs. Telemedicine improved postnatal care coverage significantly in LMICs (RR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.22-5.28, 3 studies) and decreased maternal mortality (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.21-0.98, 1 study) and infant mortality (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.45-0.95) in LMICs. Maternal education significantly decreased neonatal mortality (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66-0.84, 2 studies), perinatal mortality (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.95, 1 study), infant mortality (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.65-0.96, 1 study), and stillbirth (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.45-0.82, 1 study). Capacity-building interventions significantly decreased maternal mortality in LMICs (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.29-0.46, 5 studies), neonatal mortality overall (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.53-0.98, 4 studies) and in LMICs (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.54-0.74, 3 studies, and RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.48-0.79, 3 studies), perinatal mortality (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.45-0.62, 2 studies, and RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.95, 1 study), infant mortality (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.43-0.59, 1 study, and RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.65-0.96, 1 study), under-5 mortality (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.94, 1 study), and stillbirth in LMICs (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.62-0.82, 4 studies), and preterm birth overall (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.19-0.81, 1 study). CONCLUSION: Perinatal regionalization and facility-based interventions have a positive impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes and calls for implementation in high burden settings but a better understanding of optimal interventions is needed through comprehensive trials in diverse settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeonatologySame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207