Characterization of <i>bla</i>NDM in two <i>Escherichia coli</i> ST1193 clinical isolates in the Gulf region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Escherichia coli ST1193 is an emerging high-risk clone associated with the production of plasmid-mediated CTX-type extended-spectrum β-lactamases. However, this clone has seldom been found to contain plasmids carrying carbapenemase genes. We report two epidemiologically unlinked multidrug-resistant (MDR) clinical isolates of E. coli ST1193 with plasmids harbouring NDM-type carbapenemase genes from the Gulf region. Methods The isolates were identified by MALDI-TOF MS and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the VITEK 2/Phoenix system. A conjugation experiment was performed to assess the transferability of the resistance plasmids. Genomic DNA of both isolates was subject to Illumina sequencing; one isolate was also sequenced using Oxford Nanopore technology. Bioinformatics analyses were performed to detect antimicrobial resistance genes, and to annotate the genetic context of the NDM genes. Results and Conclusions Both isolates were resistant to carbapenems using phenotypic tests. Conjugation experiment confirmed that NDM-5-encoding plasmids of both strains could be transferred to the recipient cells. The completed NDM-5-encoding plasmid of E. coli isolate FQ71 was highly similar to several plasmids from ST410 isolates in the NCBI database. Genomic analysis revealed the presence of transposase genes and transposons in the flanking regions of the NDM genes in the plasmids. Since carbapenems constitute first-line agents for the treatment of serious infections caused by ESBL producers, E. coli ST1193 isolates co-producing ESBL and NDM-type carbapenemases represent a serious challenge for antimicrobial stewardship and infection control programmes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".