Mapping knowledge structures and theme trends in sport diplomacy: a bibliometric analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to analyse knowledge structures and thematic trends in sport diplomacy, an increasingly prominent field. Using bibliometric analysis of 331 studies from the Web of Science (WoS) database, this study identified several key themes, including the role of sport in promoting peace and diplomacy, the use of sport as a tool for soft power, and the challenges and opportunities of hosting sport mega-events. The study also identified several knowledge structures, including the relationship between sport and (international) politics, globalization, and the role of sport in cultural diplomacy. These findings provide insights for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners, guiding theory development, interdisciplinary collaboration, and practical applications. In summary, this study contributes to understanding the evolution and current state of sport diplomacy scholarship, fostering continued progress in this dynamic field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.021 | 0.181 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it