MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404116096 · doi:10.1098/rspa.2024.0329

A stochastic mechanism causing long or short transients near a bifurcation point

2024· article· en· W4404116096 on OpenAlexaff
Luis F. Gordillo, Priscilla E. Greenwood

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcosystem dynamics and resilience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBifurcationMechanism (biology)Point (geometry)Bifurcation theoryMathematicsControl theory (sociology)Statistical physicsEconomicsMechanicsPhysicsComputer scienceGeometryNonlinear systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When a bifurcation parameter in a deterministic model becomes a stochastic process, additional new stochastic processes may arise near a critical parameter value. By examining the sample paths of a population model with a strong Allee effect, in which the bifurcation parameter is defined as an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (OU) process, we find that transient times before extinction may be extended or shortened according to the excursions of the OU process. We find the distributions of transient times as they depend on process parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesSame topicEcosystem dynamics and resilienceFrench-language works237,207