MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404117106 · doi:10.3389/fams.2024.1471447

Corrigendum: A scalar Poincaré map for anti-phase bursting in coupled inhibitory neurons with synaptic depression

2024· erratum· en· W4404117106 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics · 2024
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWellcome Trust
KeywordsBurstingInhibitory postsynaptic potentialNeuroscienceScalar (mathematics)Depression (economics)PsychologyMathematicsEconomicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% This is just an example/guide for you to refer to when submitting manuscripts to Frontiers, it is not mandatory to use Frontiers .cls files nor frontiers.tex % This will only generate the Manuscript, the final article will be typeset by Frontiers after acceptance. % When submitting your files, remember to upload this *tex file, the pdf generated with it, the *bib file (if bibliography is not within the *tex) and all the figures.%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Version 3.3 Generated 2018/06/15 %%%%%% You will need to have the following packages installed: datetime, fmtcount, etoolbox, fcprefix, which are normally included in WinEdt. %%%%%% In http://www.ctan.org/ you can find the packages and how to install them, if necessary. %%%\documentclass[utf8]{frontiers_correction} %\setcitestyle{square} % for articles in the journals "Frontiers in Physics" and "Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics"\usepackage{url,hyperref,lineno,microtype}\usepackage[onehalfspacing]{setspace}\linenumbers% Leave a blank line between paragraphs instead of using \\%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% A corrigendum refers to a change to their article that the author wishes to publish after publication. The publication of this article is subject to Frontiers Editorial approval.% Instructions:% ● please read through all the templates before choosing % ● pick the most relevant text template(s) from the following page and delete all others.% ● edit the text as necessary, ensuring that the original incorrect text is included for the record, please see the below.% ● please do not use any extra formatting when editing the templates, and only modify the red text unless absolutely necessary% ● submit to Frontiers here: https://www.frontiersin.org/submission/submit following the instructions on this page: https://zendesk.frontiersin.org/hc/en-us/articles/115003295805-How-can-I-add-submit-a-Corrigendum-% When the original text contained incorrect information, to preserve the scientific record, please include that text when editing the below templates. For example:% INCORRECT EXAMPLE:% There was a mistake in the Funding statement, an incorrect number was used. The correct number is “2015C03Bd051.”. The publisher apologizes for this mistake. The original version of this article has been updated. % CORRECT EXAMPLE:% In the published article, there was a mistake in the Funding statement. The funding statement for the Key Development Project of the Department of Science and Technology was displayed as “2015CBd051”. The correct statement is “Key Development Project of Department of Science and Technology (2015C03Bd051).’’ %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\def\keyFont{\fontsize{8}{11}\helveticabold }\def\firstAuthorLast{Sample {et~al.}} %use et al only if is more than 1 author\def\Authors{Mark Olenik\,$^{1,*}$ and Conor Houghton\,$^{2}$}% Affiliations should be keyed to the author's name with superscript numbers and be listed as follows: Laboratory, Institute, Department, Organization, City, State abbreviation (USA, Canada, Australia), and Country (without detailed address information such as city zip codes or street names).% Affiliations of all authors must be the same as they appear in the published original version of the article, unless affiliations are being corrected in the corrigendum, in which case use the new affiliations.% If one of the authors has a change of address, list the new address below the correspondence details using a superscript symbol and use the same symbol to indicate the author in the author list.\def\Address{$^{1}$School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom \\$^{2}$School of Computer Science, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Engineering Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom}\def\corrAuthor{Mark Olenik}\def\corrEmail{m.olenik@bristol.ac.uk}\begin{document}\onecolumn\firstpage{1}\title {Corrigendum: A Scalar Poincaré Map for Anti-phase Bursting in Coupled Inhibitory Neurons With Synaptic Depression.} % this must be the full title of the original article\author[\firstAuthorLast ]{\Authors} %This field will be automatically populated\address{} %This field will be automatically populated\correspondance{} %This field will be automatically populated\extraAuth{}% If there are more than 1 corresponding authors, comment this line and uncomment the next one.%\extraAuth{corresponding Author2 \\ Laboratory X2, Institute X2, Department X2, Organization X2, Street X2, City X2 , State XX2 (only USA, Canada and Australia), Zip Code2, X2 Country X2, email2@uni2.edu}\maketitle{\tiny {\keyFont{ \*{Keywords:} Poincaré map, neuronal bursting, dynamical system (DS), synaptic depression, central pattern generator }}} % These must be taken from the original version of the article. \subsection*{A Corrigendum on \textit{A Scalar Poincaré Map for Anti-phase Bursting in Coupled Inhibitory Neurons With Synaptic Depression.}} % Insert citation from original version of the article.%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Please pick the most relevant text template(s), delete all others, and edit as necessary. Clearly state the mistake being fixed.%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\vspace{10mm}\subsection*{Text Correction}In the published article, there were errors in Equations 51-54. The correct Equations 51-52 are:\begin{align} \bar g_{\mathcal{L}}(n+1) & < \bar g_{\mathcal{R}}(n)\tag{51}, \\ \bar g_{\mathcal{R}}(n+1) - \bar g_{\mathcal{L}}(n+1) & < \bar g_{\mathcal{R}}(n) - \bar g_{\mathcal{L}}(n)\tag{52}.\end{align}The correct Equation 53 is\begin{equation} F_n(\phi_n(\bar g), \bar g) = T_{s}.\tag{53}\end{equation}The correct Equation 54 is\begin{equation} \mathcal{R}_{n}(\bar g):=F_n(\phi_n(\bar g), \bar g)-T_{s}. \tag{54}\end{equation}A correction has been made to \textbf{Results}, \textbf{\textit{section 3.6}}.\parThe authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.%\bibliographystyle{Frontiers-Harvard} % Many Frontiers journals use the Harvard referencing system (Author-date), to find the style and resources for the journal you are submitting to: https://zendesk.frontiersin.org/hc/en-us/articles/360017860337-Frontiers-Reference-Styles-by-Journal. For Humanities and Social Sciences articles please include page numbers in the in-text citations %\bibliographystyle{Frontiers-Vancouver} % Many Frontiers journals use the numbered referencing system, to find the style and resources for the journal you are submitting to: https://zendesk.frontiersin.org/hc/en-us/articles/360017860337-Frontiers-Reference-Styles-by-Journal%\bibliography{test} % Add as needed if the correction includes referenced data%%% Upload the *bib file along with the *tex file and PDF on submission if the bibliography is not in the main *tex file% If this corrigendum relates to a figure or figures please upload it/them when submitting the article. Frontiers will add the figures at the end of the provisional pdf automatically% The use of LaTeX coding to draw Diagrams/Figures/Structures should be avoided. They should be external callouts including graphics.% End of template, if you would like to request a correction for a reason not seen here, please contact the journal’s Editorial Office\end{document}

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it