Low and sustained doses of erythropoietin prevent preterm infants from intraventricular hemorrhage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In addition to its hematopoietic function, erythropoietin (EPO) has demonstrated neuroprotective properties in preclinical studies, particularly in cases of reduced oxygenation or ischemia in the neonatal brain. While these findings have sparked optimism for its potential clinical application, the efficacy of EPO remains contentious in translational assays. Notably, while repeated administration of low doses of EPO has correlated with a decrease in adverse outcomes, the use of high EPO doses has shown either negligible or potentially detrimental effects on the incidence of brain injury. In this pilot study, we explored the effects of low and sustained doses of EPO (400 IU/kg) on the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in premature infants. EPO was administered intravenously three times a week until the infants reached 32 weeks corrected gestational age. Our results indicate a significant decrease in the incidence of IVH with EPO treatment. Although, this study does not provide conclusive evidence on EPO's ability to reverse established IVH, these results strongly support the need for larger-scale clinical trials to further assess EPO's therapeutic potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".