El Zorro: early Jurassic intrusion-related gold (IRG) mineralization in the oldest, western-most segment of the Andean Cordillera of Northern Chile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The El Zorro gold district is the most recent gold discovery in the Coastal Cordillera of northern Chile. Ternera is the largest deposit in the district with total resources currently estimated at 1.282 Moz. New geology, geochemistry and geochronology data indicate that hydrothermal mineralization is mostly hosted within felsic to intermediate, ilmenite-bearing calc-alkaline dikes and stocks of the Upper Triassic to Lower Jurassic Relincho Pluton, and some of the adjacent Devonian to Carboniferous metasediments of the Chañaral Epimetamorphic Complex. Sheeted veins, veinlets, and fault zones with quartz, low amounts of pyrite, pyrrhotite and arsenopyrite, and local calcite are surrounded by narrow haloes of albite-biotite-quartz ± sulfides-K-feldspar-sericite-chlorite. Gold (mostly in the veins) is associated with elevated W-Bi and also As-Te-Sn, and not with iron enrichment or base metals, even though this system is proximal (~ 20 km) to IOCG and IOA deposits of the Coastal Cordillera. The main phase of gold mineralization occurred soon after emplacement of tonalitic dikes and granodiorite from the Relincho and Cuevitas plutons (U–Pb zircon between ~ 205 and 190 Ma), about 80 m.y. later than the development of orogenic fabrics. An absolute upper age limit is provided by compositionally distinct ore-cutting mafic dikes dated at 175–170 Ma (U–Pb apatite). The deposit falls into the intrusion-related gold category, as indicated by the cutting of earlier orogenic fabrics, the metal and alteration associations, and the spatial and temporal connection to reduced ilmenite-series intrusions, which are also very similar geochemically to the ‘type-locality’ IRG intrusions of the Tintina Belt in Yukon/Alaska. The El Zorro gold district represents the oldest and geologically western-most mineralizing event in the Central Andes of northern Chile, consistent with its time–space placement within the tectonic framework of easterly-younging mineralization and igneous activity in the Chilean Cordillera.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".