Numerical investigation of hydrodynamic performance and power consumption in stirred reactors with perforated Scaba <scp>6SRGT</scp> impellers for non‐Newtonian fluid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The present study aims to further understand the effect of perforated Scaba 6SRGT impellers on stirring performance and impeller power consumption by numerically investigating the hydrodynamic properties of non‐Newtonian fluids in a three‐dimensional stirred reactor. After model validation, the fluid velocity, stagnant region dimensionless volume, and impeller power consumption are quantitatively analyzed under the conditions of influencing parameters, including blade perforation pitch, ratio of distance between adjacent perforations, and perforation arrangement. The results reveal that the range of distribution of acceleration and peak velocity of the fluid along the radial appear in regions lower and larger than the dimensionless radius of the impeller (| r/R | = 0.45), respectively. Increasing the perforation pitch from 14 to 20 mm increases fluid velocity from 0.284 to 0.305 m/s and power consumption from 26.99 to 27.25 W, while reducing the stagnant region volume from 16.76% to 14.71%. The fluid velocity and impeller power consumption slightly increase with the ratio of distance between adjacent perforations. Circular‐shaped middle perforations yield higher fluid velocities and vorticity compared to lozenge‐shaped ones. The highest and lowest power consumptions are obtained by circular–circular–circular and lozenge–lozenge–lozenge perforation shape arrangements with values of 27.25 and 26.9 W, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".