MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404121512 · doi:10.1177/17455057241291271

Impact of ambient heat exposure on pregnancy outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

2024· review· en· W4404121512 on OpenAlexaff
Sohail Lakhani, Sobia Ambreen, Zahra Ali Padhani, Yusra Fahim, Sana Qamar, Salima Meherali, Zohra S Lassi

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen s Health · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyCINAHLAbortionObservational studyMiscarriageObstetricsScopusMEDLINEEnvironmental healthPsychological interventionPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasing global temperatures due to climate change have raised serious concerns regarding its potential impact on health outcomes. Pregnant women and their fetuses are among the most vulnerable groups being affected by these dramatic changes resulting in adverse outcomes for both the mother and the developing fetus. Evidence regarding heat-related pregnancy adversities in high-income countries is conclusive, however, such evidence is rare in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This review was conducted to bridge the knowledge gap by providing evidence-based insights into the specific repercussions of high heat exposures during pregnancy and its effect on birth outcomes in LMICs. A systematic review was conducted to assess the impact of high environmental or ambient temperatures on pregnancy outcomes (abortion, stillbirth, preterm birth, and low birthweight (LBW)) in LMICs. Electronic searches were conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus. Observational studies published between 2010 and 2023 were included in the review. Screening of studies was done using Covidence software, data was extracted on Excel sheets and quality assessment was done using the National Institutes of Health's National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute tool. We included 11 studies. Four of six studies that included preterm births showed an association between heat and preterm births. Four of five studies reported an association between heat exposure and LBW. Three of four studies on stillbirths showed a significant association between heat exposure and stillbirths. One of the two studies that reported spontaneous abortion revealed a significant association of heat with abortion. Meta-analysis could not be performed due to the lack of homogeneity in defining heat exposure. Amongst the included studies, seven were categorized as "good" and four were categorized as "fair" on methodological quality. This study concluded that ambient temperature and heat exposure during pregnancy can impact birth outcomes such as preterm births, LBWs, abortions, and stillbirths in LMICs. Urgent action is imperative on both national and global scales to facilitate a comprehensive and definitive assessment of heat exposure in LMICs, enabling a deeper understanding of its repercussions on pregnant women. Longitudinal studies are paramount for confirming these associations and devising targeted interventions and strategies aimed at enhancing maternal and child health within LMIC contexts. Registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42023449173.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWomen s HealthSame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207