MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404123658 · doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.4c00933

Alkaloids and Styryl Lactones from <i>Goniothalamus tortilipetalus</i> and Their Biological Activities

2024· article· en· W4404123658 on OpenAlexaff
Sorraya Champakam, Brian O. Patrick, Natcha Injan, Somkiat Nokbin, Sarot Cheenpracha, Zi Han Loh, Tharakorn Maneerat, Panom Winyayong, Phunrawie Promnart, Siau Hui Mah, Raymond J. Andersen, Surat Laphookhieo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Natural Products · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTraditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMinistry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, ThailandNational Research Council of ThailandMae Fah Luang University
KeywordsStereochemistryPharmacognosyLactoneTraditional medicineChemistryBiological activityMedicineIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Phytochemical investigations of the twig and leaf extracts of Goniothalamus tortilipetalus resulted in the isolation and identification of two new alkaloids, goniotortiline ( 1 ) and goniotortilactam ( 2 ), three new styryl lactone derivatives, goniotortilactone ( 3 ) and goniotortilols A ( 4 ) and B ( 5 ), and 25 known compounds. Their structures were elucidated by spectroscopic methods and HRESITOFMS data. Compounds 5, 13, 15, 16, 22, and 30 inhibited nitric oxide (NO) production with IC 50 values ranging from 8.7 ± 0.1 to 17 ± 1 μM, revealing stronger effects than the standard drug, dexamethasone (IC 50 16.9 ± 2.2 μM), and compound 30 possessed the most potent NO production inhibition. Compounds 12 and 29 demonstrated notable efficacy in enhancing glucose consumption with IC 50 values of 77 ± 4 and 66 ± 4 μM, respectively, while their glucose uptakes were 1.7- and 2-fold, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Natural ProductsSame topicTraditional and Medicinal Uses of AnnonaceaeFrench-language works237,207