MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404123954 · doi:10.1186/s12903-024-05024-9

Correction: An open‑label, parallel‑group, randomized clinical trial of different silver diamine fluoride application intervals to arrest dental caries

2024· erratum· en· W4404123954 on OpenAlexaff
Robert J. Schroth, Sukeerat Bajwa, Victor H. K. Lee, Betty‐Anne Mittermuller, Sarbjeet Singh, Vivianne Cruz de Jesus, Mary Bertone, Prashen Chelikani

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Oral Health · 2024
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Research and COVID-19
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaManitoba Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialDentistryOral and maxillofacial surgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following the publication of the original article, the author would like to correct the typo in Figure 1. The flow diagram incorrectly states that at the third visit a second application of SDF/FV was performed. This should not be there. The incorrect and correct Figure 1 are shown in this correction article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.134
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.134
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0070.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.486
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Oral HealthSame topicDental Research and COVID-19French-language works237,207