Significant Chiral Asymmetry Observed in Neutral Amino Acid Ultraviolet Photolysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The origin of homochirality in biological organisms remains an open question. Some suggest that its origin might be extraterrestrial, specifically due to the exposure of chiral molecules to circularly polarized photons in interstellar space, which could cause an initial population imbalance leading to the homochirality observed today. However, this extraterrestrial hypothesis has not been widely accepted, largely due to the belief that molecular optical rotatory dispersion is too insignificant to create the substantial imbalance required for homochirality. Here we report experimental evidence that specific conformers of neutral amino acids exhibit significant asymmetry in the chiral destroying dissociation rate induced by circularly polarized photons. The observed anisotropy factor for the lowest energy conformer of leucine was remarkably large, reaching 0.1─a factor of 13 times larger than observed for zwitterionic leucine in solid films, and nearly 40 times greater than the anisotropy reported in the electronic absorption spectrum of gas-phase leucine ensembles at room temperature. This significant finding indicates that even if reported anisotropy values in the electronic absorption spectrum are low, the dissociation asymmetry of certain conformers can still be substantial. An anisotropy factor of 0.1 could result in an initial enantiomeric excess exceeding 10%, even with a 90% extent of reaction. This discovery suggests that asymmetric photodissociation of amino acids may have been a crucial factor in the emergence of biological homochirality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".