Severe Corneal Flattening After Endothelial Keratoplasty: Collagen Compaction Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to present a case series of patients with extreme corneal flattening after uneventful endothelial keratoplasty (EK): collagen compaction syndrome. METHODS: Four patients (2 men, 2 women, mean age 64.8 ± 11.8 years) underwent successful EK after a period of chronic corneal edema (4-7.5 months): 3 received Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty after unsuccessful Descemet stripping only for Fuchs dystrophy and 1 received Descemet automated endothelial keratoplasty after prolonged pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. RESULTS: All patients developed significant corneal flattening, affecting their vision and inducing a large hyperopic refractive outcome, best-corrected visual acuities ranging from 20/40 to 20/200. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic corneal edema may result in severe corneal flattening after EK. Preoperative duration of stromal edema might affect the outcome of EK and should, therefore, be considered in the timing of surgery. In cases of dense focal edema, including post-Descemet stripping only surgery, rescue treatment at week 8 should be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".