MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404130135 · doi:10.1145/3689933.3690837

Auto-CIDS: An Autonomous Intrusion Detection System for Vehicular Networks

2023· article· en· W4404130135 on OpenAlexaff
Mohsen Sorkhpour, Abbas Yazdinejad, Ali Dehghantanha

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceIntrusion detection systemComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Control Area Network (CAN), despite facilitating electronic control unit (ECU) communications, lacks built-in mechanisms for secure transmission, exposing its messages to cyber-attacks due to unsecured broadcasting. Current Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) for CAN rely predominantly on rule-based, statistical, or supervised machine learning (ML) models, which require significant human intervention for tasks such as reconfiguration, gathering labeled data samples, and retraining with newly released vehicle models. These manual dependencies highlight the critical need for autonomous capability in IDS that can adapt independently, thus mitigating practical deployment challenges in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we propose an autonomous cybersecurity IDS named Auto-CIDS, designed to minimize human intervention and enable active learning utilizing past experiences. By applying Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) with the advantages of unsupervised algorithms, we train Deep Q-network (DQN) agents in a self-supervised manner using their own past experiences. We develop three standalone autonomous methods. The first method, Single-Task Self-Supervised, uses an autoencoder to supervise DQN agents in each environment, which includes both normal and specific attack data without needing labeled datasets. The second method, Multi-Environment Self-Supervised, enhances the generalization ability of the first by training a DQN agent across multiple environments, allowing knowledge transfer from varied settings into a single agent. The third method, Multi-Task Multi-Agent, increases the robustness of our proposed Auto-CIDS by employing a combination of modified unsupervised methods, including autoencoder, k-means, and isolation forest algorithms, each tailored for a specific type of attack. This approach builds attack-specific DQNs that periodically and cooperatively train a global DQN agent based on their predictions, facilitating ongoing active learning. We conducted experiments on the Car-Hacking dataset, which includes Denial of Service (DoS), fuzzy, and spoofing attacks, and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of these methods in detecting cyber-attacks. The results also demonstrate high evaluation metrics, including False Negative Rate (FNR), Error Rate (ER), accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 score. Additionally, these methods significantly reduce the need for human intervention by enhancing the autonomy of our proposed IDS. This increased autonomy enables the systems to adapt to new environments, thereby making our Auto-CIDS more autonomous and adaptable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207