MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404130571 · doi:10.1101/2024.11.06.24315323

Early Life Predictors of Child Development at Kindergarten: A Structural Equation Model using a Longitudinal Cohort

2024· preprint· en· W4404130571 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sarah Turner, Stephanie Goguen, Brenden Dufault, Teresa Mayer, Piush J. Mandhane, Theo J. Moraes, Stuart E. Turvey, Elinor Simons, Padmaja Subbarao, Meghan B. Azad

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural equation modelingCohortLongitudinal studyDevelopmental psychologyPsychologyChild developmentLongitudinal dataDemographyStatisticsMathematicsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Early child development sets the stage for lifelong health. Identifying early life factors related to child development can help guide programs and policies to bolster child health and wellbeing. The objective of this research was to examine how a broad range of predictors, measured prenatally to the third year of life, are related to child development at kindergarten. Methods We linked survey data from the Manitoba site of the CHILD Cohort Study with data from the Early Development Instrument (EDI) assessment, completed in kindergarten by the Manitoba public school system (n=442 children). The EDI measures five domains of development (ex. language, physical), scored to indicate the bottom 10% (i.e. ‘vulnerable’) of the population on one or more domains. Using structural equation modelling, we grouped 23 predictors of child development into six latent factors including prenatal exposures, child health and lifestyle, family stress, and socioeconomic status. We examined the associations between each latent factor and EDI vulnerability. Results Overall, 20.1% of children were vulnerable on one or more EDI domains. Higher family stress at 1 year and 3 years was related to a 0.20 (p-value ≤ 0.001) and 0.33 (p-value ≤ 0.001) standardized increase of EDI vulnerability. Higher socioeconomic status was related to a - 0.26 (p-value =0.01) standardized increase of EDI vulnerability, and this link was partially mediated through family stress at three years (10.6% mediated). Prenatal exposures (e.g. maternal diet quality), as well as child health and lifestyle factors (e.g. weekday sleep) were not related to EDI vulnerability. Conclusions Supporting parental mental health throughout early life, universal screening for early life stress, as well as targeting programs and supports for those living with low SES appear to be priority areas that could help to improve early child development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicPsychosocial Factors Impacting YouthFrench-language works237,207