Effect of a home-based exercise program on subsequent falls among community-dwelling older adults with cognitive frailty: A sub-group analysis of a randomized controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Cognitive frailty is characterized by concurrent physical frailty and mild cognitive impairment and is associated with increased risk of falls. Exercise is an evidence-based strategy to prevent falls, but whether exercise reduces falls in people with cognitive frailty is unknown. We examined the effects of home-based exercise on subsequent falls among community-dwelling older adults with cognitive frailty who have previously fallen. STUDY DESIGN: A sub-group analysis of a 12-month, single-blind, randomized controlled trial among 344 adults aged 70 years or more who had fallen within the past 12 months. Participants were randomized to either 12 months of home-based exercise (n=172) or usual care (n=172). In this sub-analysis, we included 192 participants with cognitive frailty (home-based exercise=93; usual care=99) with Short Physical Performance Battery scores ≤9/12 and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores <26/30. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Our primary analysis examined the effect of exercise on self-reported falls rate over 12 months. Secondary analyses investigated the intervention's effects on scores on the Short Physical Performance Battery and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. We also explored whether greater than or equal to mean average monthly adherence (i.e., ≥45.5%) moderated treatment effects. RESULTS: At 12 months, falls rates were 35% lower in the home-based exercise group compared with the usual care group (IRR=0.65; p=0.042). Score on the Short Physical Performance Battery significantly improved among home-based exercise participants with greater than or equal to mean adherence vs. those with less than mean adherence (estimated mean difference: 0.94; p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise is a promising strategy for reducing subsequent falls in people with cognitive frailty. Greater exercise adherence improved physical function in this population. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT01029171.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".