A sensitive period for the development of episodic-like memory in mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Episodic-like memory is a later-developing cognitive function supported by the hippocampus. In mice, the formation of extracellular perineuronal nets in subfield CA1 of the dorsal hippocampus controls the emergence of episodic-like memory during the fourth postnatal week (Ramsaran et al., 2023). Whether the timing of episodic-like memory onset is hard-wired, or flexibly set by early-life experiences during a critical or sensitive period for hippocampal maturation, is unknown. Here, we show that the trajectories for episodic-like memory development vary for mice given different sets of experiences spanning the second and third postnatal weeks. Specifically, episodic-like memory precision developed later in mice that experienced early-life adversity, while it developed earlier in mice that experienced early-life enrichment. Moreover, we demonstrate that early-life experiences set the timing of episodic-like memory development by modulating the pace of perineuronal net formation in dorsal CA1. These results indicate that the hippocampus undergoes a sensitive period during which early-life experiences determine the timing for episodic-like memory development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".