MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404147090 · doi:10.3390/cells13221842

Does Incretin Agonism Have Sustainable Efficacy?

2024· review· en· W4404147090 on OpenAlexaff
Sok‐Ja Janket, Miyo K. Chatanaka, Dorsa Sohaei, Faleh Tamimi, Jukka H. Meurman, Eleftherios P. Diamandis

Bibliographic record

VenueCells · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMcGill UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgonismIncretinExenatidePharmacologyMedicineDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetesPolitical scienceEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent clinical trials using synthetic incretin hormones, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists have demonstrated that these treatments ameliorated many complications related to obesity, emphasizing the significant impact of body weight on overall health. Incretins are enteroendocrine hormones secreted by gut endothelial cells triggered by nutrient ingestion. The phenomenon that oral ingestion of glucose elicits a much higher insulin secretion than intra-venous injection of equimolar glucose is known as the incretin effect. This also alludes to the thesis that food intake is the root cause of insulin resistance. Synthetic GLP-1 and GIP agonists have demonstrated unprecedented glucoregulation and body weight reduction. Also, randomized trials have shown their ability to prevent complications of obesity, including development of diabetes from prediabetes, reducing cardiovascular disease risks and renal complications in diabetic patients. Moreover, the benefits of these agonists persist among the patients who are already on metformin or insulin. The ultimate question is "Are these benefits of incretin agonism sustainable?" Chronic agonism of pancreatic β-cells may decrease the number of receptors and cause β-cell exhaustion, leading to β-cell failure. Unfortunately, the long-term effects of these drugs are unknown at the present because the longest duration in randomized trials is 3 years. Additionally, manipulation of the neurohormonal axis to control satiety and food intake may hinder the long-term sustainability of these treatments. In this review, we will discuss the incretins' mechanism of action, challenges, and future directions. We will briefly review other molecules involved in glucose homeostasis such as amylin and glucagon. Amylin is co-expressed with insulin from the pancreas β-cells but does not have insulinotropic function. Amylin suppresses glucagon secretion, slowing gastric emptying and suppressing the reward center in the central nervous system, leading to weight loss. However, amylin can self-aggregate and cause serious cytotoxicity and may cause β-cell apoptosis. Glucagon is secreted by pancreatic α-cells and participates in glucose homeostasis in a glucose-dependent manner. In hypoglycemia, glucagon increases the blood glucose level by glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis and inhibits glycogenesis in the liver. Several triple agonists, in combination with dual incretins and glucagon, are being developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCellsSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207