MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404148532 · doi:10.1016/j.margeo.2024.107429

Bedform development in confined and unconfined settings of the Carchuna Canyon (Alboran Sea, western Mediterranean Sea): An example of cyclic steps in shelf-incised canyons

2024· article· en· W4404148532 on OpenAlexaff
Javier Cerrillo-Escoriza, Alexander Micallef, F.J. Lobo, Ángel Puga‐Bernabéu, P. Bárcenas, Irena Schulten, Ruth Durán, Álvaro Carrión-Torrente, Adrián López‐Quirós, Marı́a Luján, Olga Sánchez-Guillamón, María José García Sánchez

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Geology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación
KeywordsCanyonGeologyBedformMediterranean seaOceanographySubmarine canyonMediterranean climateGeomorphologyContinental shelfSeabedSediment transportSedimentGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Newly acquired high-resolution multibeam bathymetry in combination with sub-bottom acoustic profiles, surficial sediment samples, and three-dimensional flow simulations made possible the characterization of bedforms along the axial channel and depositional lobe of the shelf-incised Carchuna Canyon (Alboran Sea, western Mediterranean Sea). This study aims to describe the erosional and depositional bedforms in confined and unconfined settings of the Carchuna Canyon in order to determine the genetic constraints on sedimentary processes leading to bedform development along the canyon in recent times. The straight Carchuna Canyon, deeply incised in the shelf up to 200 m off the coastline, hosts: (1) crescentic-shaped bedforms (CSBs) that exhibit distinctive crest concavities , asymmetries, and lengths along the axial channel; (2) continuous lateral levees and; (3) a channel bend with three depressed stretches of the levee crest that are less than 20 m high. A set of concentric sediment waves and two scour trails were identified proximal to the channel bend over an overbank deposit east of the Carchuna Canyon. Four acoustic units with distinct acoustic facies were defined along the sediment wave field. The sediment transport simulation shows the highest flow velocities along the Carchuna Canyon thalweg , while over the overbank deposit the highest velocity values occur along the top of the bedform crests, with the higher Froude values being found over bedform lee sides. The occurrence of CSBs along the canyon axial channel suggests the imprint of confined sediment-laden gravity flows descending from the canyon head and exhibiting a flow variability along the canyon induced by local variations of slope gradient and/or sediment concentration. A spatial relationship is identified between the development of sediment waves over the overbank deposit and lowered levee crest heights at the channel bend. In contrast, more energetic downstream turbiditic flows exceed the levee crest at the channel bend, focusing the overflow and promoting erosion of the overbank deposit, thereby generating the scour trains. Based on the recent history of overbank deposition, two alternating scenarios of flow behavior can be interpreted. In a high-density turbidity current setting, erosion would prevail along the axial channel. Widespread spillover flows of coarse-grained sediments would occur in both levees, forming heterogeneous sedimentary patterns that change downslope within the depositional lobe due to lesser turbulence of spillover turbidity currents and gentler slope gradients. In contrast, in a low-density turbidity current setting, turbidity currents flowing along the Carchuna Canyon would form depositional bedforms in the axial channel, while spillover processes would be localized at the channel bend, forming either depositional or erosional bedforms over the depositional lobe according to the frequency, magnitude and focusing of turbiditic flows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Geology→Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→