MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404151000 · doi:10.1002/smll.202404966

Impact of Tetrakis(dimethylamido)tin(IV) Degradation on Atomic Layer Deposition of Tin Oxide Films and Perovskite Solar Cells

2024· article· en· W4404151000 on OpenAlexafffund
Shuang Qiu, Augusto Amaro, Diana Fabulyak, Julien Appleby‐Millette, Dongyang Zhang, Vishal Yeddu, I Teng Cheong, Irina Paci, Makhsud I. Saidaminov

Bibliographic record

VenueSmall · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsSeastar Chemicals (Canada)University of Victoria
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsTinAtomic layer depositionDegradation (telecommunications)Materials scienceTin oxidePerovskite (structure)Layer (electronics)Deposition (geology)OxideChemical engineeringNanotechnologyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Tin oxide (SnO x ) films synthesized by atomic layer deposition (ALD) are widely explored in a range of optoelectronic devices including electrochemical sensors, transistors, and photovoltaics. However, the integrity of the key ALD‐SnO x precursor, namely tetrakis(dimethylamido)tin (IV) (TDMASn), and its influence on the properties of ultimate films remain unexplored. Here a significant degradation of TDMASn into bis(dimethylamido)tin(II) via the Sn‐imine complex is reported, and its impact on the corresponding films and devices is examined. It is found, surprisingly, that this degradation does not affect the growth kinetics and morphology of ALD‐SnO x films. But it notably deteriorates their electronic properties, resulting in films with twice the electrical resistance due to different oxidation mechanisms of the degradation products. Perovskite solar cells employing such films exhibit a significant loss in power conversion efficiency, primarily due to charge transport and transfer losses. These findings urge strategies to stabilize TDMASn, a critical precursor for ALD‐SnO x films, or to identify alternative materials to achieve efficient and reliable devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmallSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207