Ultrafast 3D synthetic aperture imaging with Hadamard-encoded aperiodic interval codes and aperiodic sparse arrays with separate transmitters and receivers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
3D synthetic aperture (SA) imaging of volumes can be obtained using sparse 2D ultrasound arrays. However, even with just 256 elements, the volumetric imaging rate can be relatively slow due to having to transmit on each element in succession. Hadamard Aperiodic Interval (HAPI) codes can be used to image the full SA dataset in one extended transmit to speed up the synthetic aperture imaging, but their long nature produces large deadzones if the same elements are used as both transmitters and receivers. In this simulation study, we use a 2D Costas sparse array with separate transmitters and receivers to remedy the deadzone problem, and use it with the HAPI-coded imaging scheme to obtain fully transmit-receive focused, wide field-of-view 3D volumes with high-resolution and high SNR at ultrafast volumetric imaging rates of more than 500 volumes per second, almost nine times faster than non-coded SA imaging with the same imaging parameters. We show similar PSF performance compared to non-coded SA, and a 26 dB improvement in SNR with order-256 HAPI codes. We also present cyst simulations showing similar contrast for the HAPI-coded SA method compared to non-coded SA in the context of no noise, and improved contrast in the context of noise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".