Benchmarking 3D Multi-Coil NC-PDNet MRI Reconstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning has shown great promise for MRI reconstruction from undersampled data, yet there is a lack of research on validating its performance in 3D parallel imaging acquisitions with non-Cartesian undersampling. In addition, the artifacts and the resulting image quality depend on the under-sampling pattern. To address this uncharted territory, we extend the Non-Cartesian Primal-Dual Network (NC-PDNet), a state-of-the-art unrolled neural network, to a 3D multi-coil setting. We evaluated the impact of channel-specific versus channel-agnostic training configurations and examined the effect of coil compression. Finally, we benchmark four distinct non-Cartesian undersampling patterns, with an acceleration factor of six, using the publicly available Calgary-Campinas dataset. Our results show that NC-PDNet trained on compressed data with varying input channel numbers achieves an average PSNR of 42.98dB for 1 mm isotropic 32 channel whole-brain 3D reconstruction. With an inference time of 4.95sec and a GPU memory usage of 5.49 GB, our approach demonstrates significant potential for clinical research application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".