MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404170272 · doi:10.1055/a-2436-1298

Deeply embedded esophageal fishbone removed by endoscopic submucosal dissection

2024· article· en· W4404170272 on OpenAlexaff
S Jugnundan, Sarang Gupta, Sunil Gupta, Katarzyna M. Pawlak, Christopher Teshima

Bibliographic record

VenueEndoscopy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicForeign Body Medical Cases
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOdynophagiaEsophagusRadiologyEndoscopic ultrasonographyChest painDysphagiaFish boneEndoscopic submucosal dissectionDissection (medical)EndoscopySurgeryFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 50-year-old man presented to the emergency department with chest pain and odynophagia after eating fish. Physical examination and X-ray of the neck were unremarkable. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest showed a fishbone embedded within the muscularis propria of the esophagus ([ Fig. 1 ] a ). We then performed an endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), which localized the fishbone to the posterior wall ([ Fig. 2 ]). A small mucosal defect was also noted. Fig. 1 a Coronal slice of computed tomography showed a fishbone (arrow) lodged in the distal esophagus, that appeared to penetrate through the submucosa and muscularis propria. b Endoscopically a small portion of fishbone can seen embedded in the distal esophagus through the small mucosal defect. Fig. 2 Endoscopic ultrasound showed a linear hyperdensity projecting through the muscularis propria. We proceeded with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to remove the fishbone ([ Video 1 ]). After normal saline and methylene blue had been injected to expand the submucosal space, a Dual-J knife (Olympus, Center Valley, PA) was used to create a mucosal incision, laterally extending the mucosal defect ([ Fig. 1 ] b ). The fishbone was exposed; it was positioned perpendicularly to the esophagus, between the circular and longitudinal muscle layers. Using the fishbone as a scaffold, the overlying circular muscle layer was progressively dissected until the right lateral tip of the bone was freed ([ Fig. 3 ]). The exposed tip was grasped with forceps and removed through the overtube ([ Fig. 4 ]). Examination of the defect revealed incised circular muscle fibers, with intact longitudinal fibers ([ Fig. 5 ]). Attempted closure with through-the-scope clips was unsuccessful because of the orientation of the defect. We placed a 10.5 cm × 23 mm fully covered metal stent (Wallflex; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA). Subsequent CT 48 hours later showed appropriate positioning of the stent with no complications. The stent was removed 2 weeks later, and healed mucosa was observed. Quality: mobile 360 480 720 Download Endoscopic submucosal dissection performed to remove a fishbone deeply embedded into the wall of the distal esophagus.Video 1 Fig. 3 Endoscopic submucosal dissection was done along the fishbone to free the right lateral edge from the circular muscle layer. Fig. 4 The fishbone was grasped with a rat-toothed forceps and removed via the overtube. Fig. 5 The remaining muscle defect and exposed submucosa and muscle fibers. Foreign body ingestion is frequently encountered [ 1 ]. In adults, bony fragments are most common, and tend to become lodged at sharp angulations in the gastrointestinal tract [ 2 ]. While guidelines recommend emergent endoscopy in esophageal impaction [ 3 ] [ 4 ], surgical intervention is typically required for deeply embedded nonvisible foreign bodies [ 5 ]. As we have demonstrated, in selected patients, EUS may localize the foreign body and facilitate ESD for safe and effective extraction. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AL Endoscopy E-Videos https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy , reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/ ). This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos . Publication History Article published online: 08 November 2024 © 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEndoscopySame topicForeign Body Medical CasesFrench-language works237,207