MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404173469 · doi:10.1164/rccm.202407-1394oc

Unsupervised Classification of the Host Response Identifies Dominant Pathobiological Signatures of Sepsis in Sub-Saharan Africa

2024· article· en· W4404173469 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew J. Cummings, Julius J. Lutwama, Nicholas Owor, Alin S. Tomoiaga, Jesse Ross, Moses Muwanga, Christopher Nsereko, Irene Nayiga, Stephen Kyebambe, Joseph Shinyale, Thomas Ochar, Moses Kiwubeyi, Rittah Nankwanga, Kai Nie, Hui Xie, Sam Miake-Lye, Bryan Villagomez, Jingjing Qi, Steven J. Reynolds, Martina Cathy Nakibuuka, Xuan Lu, John Kayiwa, Mercy Haumba, Joweria Nakaseegu, Xiaoyu Che, Misaki Wayengera, Sankar Ghosh, Seunghee Kim‐Schulze, W. Ian Lipkin, Barnabas Bakamutumaho, Max R. O’Donnell

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersNHLBI Division of Intramural ResearchNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteFogarty International CenterNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesBurroughs Wellcome Fund
KeywordsMedicineHost responseHost (biology)SepsisIntensive care medicineImmunologyGeneticsBiologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale The global burden of sepsis is concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa, where inciting pathogens are diverse and HIV coinfection is a major driver of poor outcomes. Biological heterogeneity inherent to sepsis in this setting is poorly defined. Objectives To identify dominant pathobiological signatures of sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa and their relationship to clinical phenotypes, patient outcomes, and biological classifications of sepsis identified in high-income countries (HICs). Methods We analyzed two prospective cohorts of adults hospitalized with sepsis (severe infection with quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score ⩾1) at disparate settings in Uganda (discovery cohort [Entebbe, urban], n = 242; validation cohort [Tororo, rural], n = 253). To identify pathobiological signatures in the discovery cohort, we applied unsupervised clustering to 173 soluble proteins reflecting key domains of the host response to severe infection. A random forest-derived classifier was used to predict signature assignment in the validation cohort. Measurements and Main Results Two signatures (Uganda Sepsis Signature [USS]-1 and USS-2) were identified in the discovery cohort, distinguished by expression of proteins involved in myeloid cell and inflammasome activation, T-cell costimulation and exhaustion, and endothelial barrier dysfunction. A five-protein classifier (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.97) reproduced two signatures in the validation cohort with similar biological profiles. In both cohorts, USS-2 mapped to a more severe clinical phenotype associated with HIV and related immunosuppression, severe tuberculosis, and increased risk of 30-day mortality. Substantial biological overlap was observed between USS-2 and hyperinflammatory and reactive sepsis phenotypes identified in HICs. Conclusions We identified prognostically enriched pathobiological signatures among patients with sepsis with diverse infections and high HIV prevalence in Uganda. Globally inclusive investigations are needed to define generalizable and context-specific mechanisms of sepsis pathobiology, with the goal of improving access to precision medicine treatment strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicDigital Imaging for Blood DiseasesFrench-language works237,207