Violencia Político-Sexual: Genealogía de un concepto de lucha
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo examina el surgimiento y la evolución del concepto de violencia político-sexual (VPS), desarrollado principalmente por colectivos feministas chilenos. Traza las raíces del término en la lucha contra la impunidad y la búsqueda de justicia en el Chile postdictatorial, en especial en el contexto de la tortura y la violencia sexual durante el régimen de Pinochet. Grupos feministas como el Colectivo Mujeres Sobrevivientes Siempre Resistentes han trabajado para visibilizar el papel del Estado en la perpetuación de la violencia sexual como una herramienta política contra mujeres y cuerpos feminizados. Este concepto aborda cuestiones más amplias de violencia, incluidas las dimensiones económicas, coloniales y ambientales. Los autores destacan que la VPS no se limita a incidentes aislados de violencia sexual, sino que está profundamente arraigada en las políticas y prácticas estatales. El análisis también explora cómo la VPS refuerza estructuras patriarcales, capitalistas y coloniales. El artículo subraya la importancia de reconocer y procesar la VPS como una forma distintiva de violencia estatal y llama a la resistencia colectiva para desafiar estos sistemas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".