EDUCATIONAL RADIO AS A MEDIATOR BETWEEN COMMUNICATION, HEALTH AND EDUCATION: REFLECTIONS FROM A REGIONAL EXPERIENCE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article proposes a reflection on the role of the mass media (MCM), with a focus on educational radios, in the context of the Brazilian Health System. Social participation, one of the central pillars of the system, presupposes the involvement of society in the allocation of resources and definition of priorities in different spheres. Educational radios emerge as mediating tools between health services and the population, promoting education and the exercise of citizenship. The study explores the impact of new information and communication technologies on the reconfiguration of media spaces and their implications for public health. In addition, it highlights the importance of disseminating health information as a right guaranteed by the 1988 Constitution. Using the educational radio station Cultura FM 99.3 MHz as a case study, we analyzed how this station operates in Nova Alta Paulista-SP, promoting social integration and awareness. The intersection between Communication and Health, based on practices such as those of the Ottawa Charter, is approached as strategic to expand the frontiers of public health. The article concludes by emphasizing the need for a continuous dialogue between the fields of Communication and Public Health, aiming to strengthen educational actions and democratize access to quality information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it