MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404195115 · doi:10.1029/2024gl109393

Sodium Enrichment of Mercury's Subsurface Through Diffusion

2024· article· en· W4404195115 on OpenAlexaff
S. Verkercke, François Leblanc, Jean‐Yves Chaufray, Liam S. Morrissey, M. Sarantos, Parvathy Prem

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsMercury (programming language)SodiumDiffusionEnvironmental scienceGeologyEnvironmental chemistryMineralogyAstrobiologyMaterials scienceChemistryPhysicsThermodynamicsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mercury's surface undergoes large temperature gradients between day and night, which repeats periodically over the same longitudes due to its 3:2 spin‐orbit resonance. This effect combined with the orbit's eccentricity, creates hot and cold geographic longitudes. The planet is covered with a highly porous regolith, allowing exospheric atoms to diffuse in depth. By using a 1‐D diffusion model, we studied the subsurface precipitation of gas over the cold and hot longitudes to understand gas retention. This work identifies the cold longitudes as favorable regions to form subsurface reservoirs closer to the surface. Moreover, subsurface reservoirs of adsorbates increase two to three times faster over cold longitudes than over hot longitudes, depending on the surface binding energy distribution of the atoms. We suggest that this result may be related to the observation that Mercury's sodium exosphere persists at later local times over the cold pole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207