Antropología de la mascarada mundial en el contexto de los universales culturales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[ES] Desde el Gẹ̀lẹ̀dé beninés hasta el Malanggan papú, pasando por el Drametse Ngacham butanés, el Hamatsa canadiense, el Narrenzunft alemán… El uso de máscaras es una constante en los festivales más representativos de etnias, culturas, y pueblos allá donde quiera que los busquemos. Proponemos por tanto una reflexión sobre la naturaleza de la Mascarada Mundial en el contexto de los Universales Culturales a fin de comprender su relevancia en la sociedad actual, así como también de identificar aquellas medidas que pudieran contribuir a su salvaguardia. A través de una investigación interdisciplinaria basada en la asistencia de las Ciencias Sociales, especialmente la Psicología y la Antropología, y el análisis en profundidad de un número suficiente de estudios etnográficos, este escrito pretende facilitar una comprensión adecuada del tema en cuestión. ¿Cómo se organizan estos desfiles y con qué propósito? ¿Qué tipo de actos simbólicos realizan sus personajes representativos y por qué? ¿Cuáles son las razones detrás de tales comportamientos? Y lo más importante, ¿cuáles son sus principales consecuencias tanto en la esfera personal como en la comunitaria? A primera vista estas festividades pueden parecer diversas: tienen lugar tanto en países como en días del año diferentes, requieren la presencia de personajes distintivos, se desarrollan de maneras desiguales... Sin embargo, seremos capaces de comprobar que pueden considerarse como parte del mismo fenómeno: la construcción de la identidad social a través del uso de la máscara en el contexto de los Universales Culturales. [EN] From the beninese Gẹ̀lẹ̀dé to the papuan Malanggan, including the bhutanese Drametse Ngacham, the canadian Hamatsa, the german Narrenzunft… The usage of masks is widely spread upon the most representative festivals of ethnicities, cultures, and peoples wherever we seek them. We therefore propose a reflection on the nature of the Global Masquerade in the context of the Universals of Culture, in what is a clear attempt to understand their importance in today’s society and to identify the measures that could contribute to its safeguarding. Through an interdisciplinary research based on the assistance of the social sciences, especially Psychology and Anthropology, and the in-depth analysis of a sufficient number of ethnographic studies, this essay intends to facilitate a proper understanding of the matter at hand. How are these parades organized and for what purpose? What kind of symbolic acts are performed by its representative characters and why? What are the reasons behind such behaviours? And more importantly, what are their main consequences both in the personal sphere as well as the community one? At first glance these festivities may seem disparate: they take place both in different countries and days of the year, they require the presence of distinctive characters, they are apparently developed in unequal ways... However, we will be able to ascertain that they can be considered as part of the same phenomenon: the construction of social identity through the use of the mask in the context of the Universals of Culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".