Optimization of sound absorption of recycled Nylon fibrous materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A semi-empirical model for the assessment and an optimization procedure of the sound absorption coefficient of compressed nonwoven fibrous materials made from recycled Nylon fibers (RNF) is developed. In general, the prediction of the sound absorption properties of materials requires the measurement of non-acoustic parameters by specialized characterization tools that are not always within reach of most laboratories. The objective of the proposed model is to establish empirical relationships between these non-acoustic parameters and the bulk density of RNF materials. These empirical relationships are then substituted into a conventional acoustic model for porous materials, namely, the model of Johnson-Champoux-Allard. The proposed model accurately predicts the sound absorption coefficients of compressed RNF materials based solely on bulk density, thickness, and frequency. This prediction is validated through impedance tube measurements. Moreover, the model is used with a proposed optimization producedure to identify the ideal density and thickness for maximum sound absorption at a specific frequency. Impedance tube measurements on optimized configurations confirm the effectiveness of this optimization process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".