The effects of bisphenol A and its analogs on steroidogenesis in MA-10 Leydig cells and KGN granulosa cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bisphenols are a family of chemicals used in the manufacture of consumer products containing polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. Studies have shown that exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) may disrupt steroidogenesis and induce adverse effects on male and female reproduction, but little is known about BPA replacements. We determined the effects of six bisphenols on the steroidogenic function of MA-10 Leydig cells and KGN granulosa cells by measuring the levels of progesterone and estradiol produced by these cells as well as the expression of transcripts involved in steroid and cholesterol biosynthesis. MA-10 and KGN cells were exposed for 48 h to one of six bisphenols (0.01-50 μM): BPA, bisphenol F, bisphenol S, bisphenol AF, bisphenol M, or bisphenol TMC, under both basal and dibutyryl cAMP (Bu2cAMP)-stimulated conditions. In MA-10 cells, most bisphenols increased the Bu2cAMP-stimulated production of progesterone. In KGN cells, there was a general decrease in progesterone production, while estradiol levels were increased following exposure to many bisphenols. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analyses revealed that all six bisphenols (≥1 μM) upregulated the expression of STAR, a cholesterol transporter, in both cell lines after stimulation. Key transcripts directly involved in steroid and cholesterol biosynthesis were significantly altered in a cell line, chemical, and concentration-dependent manner. Thus, BPA and five of its analogs can disrupt steroid production in two steroidogenic cell lines and alter the levels of transcripts involved in this process. Importantly, BPA replacements do not appear to have fewer effects than BPA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".