Weak paleointensities from 1.6 Ga Greenland dykes: Further evidence for a billion-year period of paleomagnetic dipole low during the Paleoproterozoic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• New weak-field paleointensity results from 1.6 Ga Greenland dyke swarm. • Rigorous statistical analysis of dipole strength during the Paleoproterozoic. • Evidence for a billion-year paleomagnetic dipole low. The Paleoproterozoic era is the longest in Earth's history, with significant changes hypothesised to have occurred in the deep Earth's physical and chemical conditions at this time. It has been suggested that the paleomagnetic field became weaker at this time (∼2.4 Ga) and remained weak for the next billion years. Paleomagnetism is intrinsically linked to, and is able to inform on, ancient deep Earth processes; a weak dipole strength sustained over this time period may have implications for both core and mantle evolution. We test this hypothesis here in a two-fold approach: (1) A paleointensity study on the widespread ca. 1.6 Ga diabase/dolerite Melville Bugt dyke swarm. The swarm extends along the west coast of Greenland for more than 1000 km and intruded over ∼13 million years, capturing polarity reversals of Earth's magnetic field. (2) A detailed statistical analysis on the long-term trend in average dipole moment from an improved paleointensity dataset (PINT.org) that has recently undergone a major update. Five of the Greenland dykes produce paleointensity results ranging from 1.4 μT to 5.1 μT (virtual dipole moment range 0.3–1.2 × 10 22 Am 2 ) during the mid-point of this extended period of ‘dipole low’. Our statistical study robustly confirms that this one-billion-year period was indeed associated with an anomalously weak dipole moment (2.7 × 10 22 Am 2 ) relative to 500-million-year intervals before and after, which were almost twice as strong. Sampling of more geographically diverse rocks from this time is needed to yield a clear picture of the long-term time evolution of the dipole moment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".