Tracking hydrothermal particles from the ridge axis to the sediment column along the Endeavour segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elemental fluxes associated with mid-ocean ridge hydrothermal systems are thought to be important in the ocean budgets of many elements but quantitative models of these fluxes, and how they vary in space and time due to different boundary conditions, are in their infancy. This is especially true for non-conservative elements that can be involved in multiple processes transforming them between the dissolved and particulate phases both in the water column and after sedimentation. To help develop a more robust database for parameterizing the processes operating, we undertook a coupled sediment trap and sediment core study of hydrothermal sediments on the west flank of the Endeavour segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. Sediment traps deployed in the Main Endeavour Field (MEF) and 3 and 9 km southwest of this field, along the mean flow direction of the hydrothermal plume, show that the rate of change of the concentration of sulfide-associated elements (Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, Ag, As, Mo) in sediment settling from the plume differs between elements. We interpret this as indicating both different dissolution rates of phases containing these elements and different rates of scavenging of these elements from seawater. Scavenging is most readily tracked using elements for which the scavenged fraction is large relative to the hydrothermally derived fraction. For such elements, the relative efficiency of scavenging from seawater (REE > Cr > Ni > V > P > U) matches that previously reported from the TAG system on the Mid-Atlantic ridge despite different vent fluid and seawater chemistries that are expected to lead to both differing roles of Fe-sulfide and Fe-oxyhydroxides and different Fe oxidation rates. In the sediment trap samples collected 9 km off-axis, but not in those collected 3 km off-axis, the Mn and Ti concentrations correlate strongly despite these samples having much higher Mn concentrations than background sediment. Since Ti is sourced almost entirely from background terrigenous material such a correlation was not expected. The most reasonable explanation for this is that aggregation of hydrothermally derived particles with terrigenous material settling through the water column controls removal of hydrothermally derived particles from the water column. Changes in sediment composition with depth in the off-axis sediment core, along with differences between the composition of material from the sediment core and the off-axis sediment traps, are interpreted as indicating large post-deposition changes in sediment composition. For example, much or all of the Mn, P, As and Mo carried to the sediments with hydrothermally derived particles is released back into the water column during diagenesis. In contrast, V and REE concentrations in the sediment core are higher than those in the off-axis sediment trap samples, which may be due to continued scavenging in a benthic boundary layer post-deposition. Overall these data are interpreted as indicating that the net loss of many elements from the non-buoyant plume may not be a proxy for loss from the ocean, and a better understanding of post-depositional processes in hydrothermal settings may be important in understanding cycling of the aforementioned elements, and likely others, in seawater. • Hydrothermal particles dissolve at different rates within the water column. • Early diagenesis is important in controlling net fluxes of many elements. • Benthic scavenging is important in controlling REE and V fluxes. • Post-depositional processes are potentially invisible to plume surveys.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".