Electroencephalography derived connectivity informing epilepsy surgical planning: Towards clinical applications and future perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Brain surgery is one of the most effective approaches in drug-resistant epilepsy. • Electrical source imaging and functional connectivity are promising methods for non-invasive localization of the epileptogenic network. • The methodological heterogeneity in connectivity application represents a limitation for the clinical translation. • Investigations on benchmarking connectivity measures and prospective studies may promote applications in clinical practice. • Future investigation would benefit from the inclusion of personalized methods as in-silico simulative approaches. Epilepsy is one of the most diffused neurological disorders, affecting 50 million people worldwide. Around 30% of patients have drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), defined as failure of at least two tolerated antiseizure medications (ASMs) to achieve sustained seizure freedom. Brain surgery is an effective therapeutic approach in this group, hinging on the accurate localization of the epileptic focus. The latter task is complex and requires multimodal investigation methods. Epilepsy is also a network disorder and represents one of the best application scenarios of methods leveraging brain functional organization at large scales. Connectivity analysis represents a promising tool for improving surgical assessment, enabling better identification of candidates who could benefit the most from epilepsy surgery. The scalp electroencephalography (EEG) is the most relevant tool to characterize epileptic activity. The EEG has benefited significantly from technological advancement across the last decades. Firstly, electrical source imaging (ESI) allows the reconstruction of electrical activity detected by EEG at the cortex level; secondly, functional connectivity (FC) allows the assessment of functional dependencies across brain areas. The EEG has therefore expanded potential applications in the localization and characterization of the epileptogenic network for surgical planning. As the translation of these methods in clinical practice is little discussed in the literature, we reviewed the investigations using EEG-derived FC. We showed that the FC-informed identification of the epileptic networks improves the localization precision in focal epilepsy. We discussed the heterogeneity in the results and methodology preventing prompt research-to-clinic translation. We finally provided practical suggestions for promoting the applicability of FC-based research in real clinical practice, looking for future research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".